| CRC Deep and Wide |
CRC Index
The Control & Risk Calculator is designed to help you record, track, assess, and prioritize the controls that bound your company's information use, protection, and preservation. In general, its utility is predicated on three categories of information about your organizational environment:
As noted in the CRC Overview, you can define your control environments and efforts for the CRC in any way that's useful and meaningful in the context of your own governance goals. The CRC does provide some structure in its assessment functions however. Most of its information is gathered through simple questionnaires similar to this: ![]()
![]()
Although recommendations have only three states—"no action indicated," "eventual action" and "immediate action"—there are many ways to arrive at any given state, and the CRC algorithm for calculating action recommendations does reflect every characteristic you define. Within the CRC interface, these recommendations look something like this: ![]()
The Control Tracking table shown above has many uses, in addition to the risk-based control recommendations it displays. By expanding the table to show all columns and data, you can review all of the data and intermediate calculations that cumulatively support your risk-based control recommendations. This is effectively a 20,000-foot view of your organization's risk and control landscape, on demand and at your fingertips. The CRC's ability to let you see your system weight, risk factors, and control environment side-by-side is one of its more useful functions. Many organizations store and track these types of information separately, which can lead to fragmented and fuzzy risk analyses. Helping you to reduce such fragmentation is one of the things the CRC is designed to do. The following image shows what a fully expanded Control Tracking table might look like. Note that this is the same table shown in the previous image, except with all information revealed:
Within the Control Tracking table, you can sort controls by recommended action or ID. Sorting by action will effectively result in a prioritized list of control activities, wherein controls that are likely (according to the data you've provided) to need more immediate augmentation or support are listed first. The CRC is also designed to support risk management that's responsive to ever-changing variables of control strength, risk conditions, and systems definitions. Within the Control Tracking table, you can very easily change or update the control and risk characteristics for any defined control, and then review the impact of those changes both on the CRC's intermediate calculations and final risk-based control recommendation. In addition, you can always change any system's characteristics, which will impact and update the calculations of all controls defined for that system. What the CRC doesn't doThe CRC cannot create a compliance or risk management program for you. In its current state, it can only augment your ongoing control and risk efforts. Because every organization approaches these efforts uniquely, the CRC does not require, predefine, or presuppose the existence of any particular systems, controls, or risks. Instead, represents a generic framework designed to leverage your prior work and management efforts.
The CRC does not have any inherent insight into your organizational risks and environments. Its value as a compliance and risk management support tool is dependent on the completeness and quality of the information you provide. More—and more accurate—information is likely to produce more relevant control measurements and recommendations. In its current version, the CRC does not reflect system dependencies. Although you are encouraged to define upstream and downstream dependencies in your systems definition, these relationships are not factored into you control or risk calculations. We hope to provide a way to incorporate the impact of dependencies future CRC updates. Finally, the CRC does not reflect specific uncertainty. Currently, the CRC's algorithms primarily reflect uncertainty through a slight bias towards higher risk than is strictly reflected by your inputs. For example, if you define a system (technology, process, or information) as extremely critical and sensitive, the CRC will never produce a "no action indicated" recommendation—even if you specify the strongest possible control environment and lowest possible risks. The implicit assumption is that critical systems are always subject to unrecognized risks and should therefore always be subject to review. In future updates, we hope to allow you to factor in more specific uncertainty for both individual controls and the risk environmnet. Further information:
|



Control & Risk Calculator 









