close

What Is Truth to Power?

dedicated to bridging the gaps between governance and practice, technology and business, regulation and control, risk management and real market pressures, and your own knowledge and the knowledge of your peers.
built to create a common pool of knowledge—one big brain—that lets you work more efficiently, build technology and business practices more effectively, and endure audits more effortlessly.
a neutral hub through which you can reach many valuable information nodes, resource collections, and organizations that are helping people like you already, but in fractured ways.
against the idea that auditors, analysts, and consultancies can control information simply through their ability to collect and distill it. T2P's goal is to unlock the vast body of knowledge, insight, and conventional wisdom that we all have, make it freely available to you, and help you digest and interpret it—without undue cost, bias, or hype.
Top Panel
WHAT IS T2P?
Top Panel

Expert Core: Process Improvement

Peter Davis, T2P Expert Core GuideCore Guide Peter Davis, CISA, CISSP, CSP, CMA, ISP, CNA, CMC, CCNA, CWNA, CISM, ISSPCS, PMP, SSGB, CGEIT, etc., shares his deep knowledge, experience, and advice on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of business and information governance processes.
[ More about Peter... ]



Lean Mean Dancing Machine

Many manufacturing companies have adopted Lean, and service organizations are starting to seriously consider it. Lean, like Six Sigma, is a methodology for solving business process problems. Unlike Six Sigma, it does not focus entirely on process efficiency. Lean has a slightly different focus: removing as much waste as possible in an organization. In Lean, we define waste as “anything that does not add value to the final product or service.” Instinctively you realize that removing all waste should make a process more efficient.

Rarely can you remove all the waste from a process; but the more you can remove, the more value you provide. I think most of us can identify some types of waste; for example, defective parts or employees standing around awaiting parts in a just-in-time environment.The accountants in your organization might not appreciate that inventory is indeed waste! If they don’t believe you, then tell them to send your customers a bill stating “10.00 for storage of software before shipping.”

Most of what a typical organization does is waste: as much as 99% of everything done falls into the category of waste. To identify waste in your process, map the business process and identify the process steps that add value and those that add no value. You may find that less than 1% of all the work your organization does adds value. This sounds extreme, but is accurate in some organizations.

Of course, such a process can be very demoralizing to everyone. Managers are embarrassed and worried about their bonuses. Employees may reason that when you remove all the waste you will start removing them. Realistically, many of these outcomes are not practical and also not very likely, but the possibility feeds organizational Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt (FUD).

Nevertheless, experiential evidence shows that typical Lean improvements are modest. You will not eliminate all waste. But what if you could move from 99% non-value added work (NVA) to 97% NVA? You might assume you still are not very productive. But, rhetorically, is the glass half empty or half full? Don’t look at the NVA work but focus on the value-added work. When you go from 1% of your efforts producing output to 3% of your efforts producing output, you have tripled your output. Now that’s worth talking about!

To form a Lean team in your area, look for the following types of waste and systematically remove them:

  • Defects
  • Overproduction
  • Waiting
  • Transportation
  • Inventory
  • Motion
  • Extra processing
  • Under utilized people

The hard part is getting started, so I'll tackle Kaizen events in my next post.

 

 

Recommended Resources

Corporate Governance

IT Governance

Information Management

Quality Management

Quality Improvement

Project Management

Risk Management

Architecture